Skip to main content
OTA 2023 Annual Meeting Main banner
Back

Pelvis and Acetabulum

Session: Annual Meeting Podium Session VI: Pelvis Acetabulum and Pain Management

The Utility of Multidimensional Fluoroscopy in the Treatment of Pelvis and Acetabular Fractures

Friday, October 20, 2023
3:49 PM – 3:55 PM PST
Location: 4B

    Presenting Author / Corresponding Author(s)

  • Douglas R. Haase, MD

    Orthopedic Trauma Fellow
    University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
    Houston, Texas, United States

    Disclosure(s): No financial relationships to disclose

    • Co-Author(s)

  • Stephen J. Warner, MD, PhD

    University of Texas at Houston, McGovern Medical School
    Houston, Texas, United States

  • CL

    Claire Lancaster, BS
  • MR

    Milton L. Routt, MD

    Professor and Andrew R. Burgess, MD Chair, Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryChi
    The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
    Houston, Texas, United States

  • JE

    Jonathan G. Eastman, MD

    Associate Professor
    University of Texas, Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School Memorial Herman Medical Center
    McGovern Medical School at UtHealth
    Houson, Texas, United States

Purpose: Multidimensional fluoroscopy has gained popularity in the treatment of pelvis and acetabular fractures due to its ability to generate intraoperative cross-sectional imaging. Previous studies have demonstrated its ability to reliably determine iliosacral screw placement. However, its use comes with increased radiation exposure as well as surgical time. This study sought to explore the utility of multidimensional fluoroscopy in the treatment of pelvis and acetabular fractures, the rates at which it affects treatment, and the radiation costs.

Methods: All patients who underwent operative management of a pelvic ring injury or acetabular fracture from December 1, 2021 to November 30, 2022 were reviewed. Patients were included if both multidimensional fluoroscopy and postoperative CT scans were available for review. Injury pattern, multidimensional fluoroscopy dose, total operative dose, number of spins, change in management, and postoperative CT dose were recorded. Multidimensional fluoroscopy cross-sectional imaging times were prospectively collected for 25 patients.

Results: 214 patients were included in final analysis. 194 patients (91%) received 1 spin, 19 (9%) received 2 spins, and 1 received 3 spins. Intraoperative multidimensional scan changed management in 26 patients (12%), of whom 14 (54%) were considered major changes. 133 patients were treated for a pelvic ring injury and 81 patients for an acetabular fracture. Patients with an acetabular fracture were more likely to experience a change in management (20% vs 8%, P = 0.01) based on intraoperative multidimensional fluoroscopy, but patients with a pelvic ring injury were more likely to experience a major change (90% vs 31%, P = 0.005). Multidimensional fluoroscopy made up a higher proportion of the total operative dose in acetabular fractures (54% vs 25%, P<0.001), but remained low for both patient groups compared to postoperative CT dosing (12% vs 11%, P = 0.38). Total mean increase in inoperative time for multidimensional fluoroscopy cross-sectional imaging was 365 (±39) seconds.

Conclusion: Multidimensional fluoroscopy provides significant utility during the treatment of pelvis and acetabular fractures. Intraoperative cross-sectional imaging changes surgical management in a high proportion of patients, while maintaining an acceptable amount of increased radiation exposure and operative time. The impact of changes was more frequent in patients undergoing acetabular surgery, but more significant in patients undergoing treatment of a pelvic ring injury.

Graphic